<W Contribution> Is the "Independence Movement" an unconditional sanctuary? = Proposal of Korean intellectuals

One of the weapons of the pro-North Korean left wing is the "pro-Japanese branding."

Even today, in the 21st century, the "pro-Japanese branding", which still exists in a bright red state, is used mercilessly toward those who do not like it.

-(Mr. Moon Chang-geuk) "Actually a descendant of an independence activist" (*Translator's note: Moon Chang-geuk was born in 1948. However, his remarks based on his religious view of history were exposed, and he declined the nomination because he was accused of being pro-Japanese and anti-ethnic.)

-(Pro-Japanese songs were composed by Mr. Shi-chun Park) "Only 4 songs out of 3000 songs" (*Translator's note: Shi-chun Park was born in 1913.He is a composer and musician of popular Korean songs, but he was designated and struck as a pro-Japanese sect. After his death in 1996, there was an opposition movement in the construction of museums and memorials in his hometown of Miryang (which became a national issue.)

For example, such a counterargument was pushed by the strong "pro-Japanese branding" offense and was buried as is. By the way, what is called "fairness" cannot be ignored. Just as Korean society is enthusiastic about questioning whether it is "pro-Japanese branding" until today in the 21st century. The task of rigorously questioning the content of what is called an "independence movement" is also important from the perspective of fairness.

Even with the exact same "independence movement," the "motivation" can vary widely. And if by any chance the "independence movement" was, for example, "for the communist revolution", there is no reason for Koreans to praise and treat them specially today (such as rewards).

If by any chance such a kind of independence movement (communist revolution) was successful, it is very likely that Koreans are groaning under the control of the Communist Party by this time. The "independence movement" can be roughly divided in this way.

● Independence movement for the communist revolution
● Independence movement for the revival of the former dynasty (restoration of former vested interests)
● Independence movement for pure purpose

If a close examination of the individual independence prominent figures reveals that they are the first and second, it is not appropriate to treat them exactly as in the case of a "pure independence movement." It wouldn't be possible. In such cases, the treatment (rewards, rewards, etc.) should be readjusted.

In addition, although it was stated as an "independence movement," criminals who were mainly absorbed in the de facto bandit business, such as blackmailing good residents in the Manchurian region and threatening money, said, " It is also necessary to make a clear distinction between whether or not they have been masqueraded (washed) as "independence activists".

The "pro-Japanese branding" that has been carried out in Korean society so far has brought about many side effects. Since the direct family members (fathers, etc.) of the politicians etc. were screaming "clearing the pro-Japanese branding" as much as possible, cases that corresponded to the "pro-Japanese branding" were revealed one after another.

The already excessively inclined "pro-japanese branding" has ended, from now on, it is the stage to promote the re-evaluation work for the "independence movement" which has been regarded as a sanctuary.Only then will it be a fair society that the Moon Jae-in administration advocates so much.

In practice, for example, for each individual meritorious person, the purpose (motivation) of his (meritorious person) independence movement is quantified (scoring), such as "60% for the purpose of communist revolution and 40% for the purpose of returning to the former royal government".

Considering the reality that impure ideas (communism, etc.) are gradually prevailing in South Korea, such re-evaluation work should definitely be done.

It is unusual for a person who is eligible to receive the treatment not to receive the appropriate treatment, but it would be abnormal for a person who is inappropriate to receive the treatment to receive excessive treatment.

And such "excessive treatment for inappropriate people" would clearly correspond to "accumulation". It is hoped that the Moon Jae-in administration, which prefers liquidation, will promptly start the re-evaluation work of the independence movement and quickly and correctly establish the "ethnic spirit" that the Moon Jae-in administration prefers.

It cannot be an unconditional sanctuary by saying that it is an "independence movement".