李俊錫、国民の力前代表
Lee Jun-seok, former representative of the Korean People's Republic of Korea, said, ``Both Lee Jae-myung and Democratic Party representatives were grateful for former President Moon Jae-in's request to end the fast.'' - South Korea
On the 20th, former People's Power (ruling party) representative Lee Jun-seok said, ``(Lee Jae-myung, along with Democratic Party (opposition) representative)
"I think there was a positive aspect to it, as the request to do so gave it authority," he said sarcastically. Former CEO Lee Jun-seok appeared on the CBS radio program 'Kim Hyun Jung's news this morning.
``What President Lee Jae-myung was thinking as he lay in his hospital bed was probably similar.Inwardly, he believed that one of the reasons he was going through this hardship was because of the pro-Moon Jae-in camp and the perfect alliance.'' harmony
Because it wasn't done, there would have been an idea that he lost (the last presidential election) by a margin of 0.7%." Former representative Lee Jun-seok said, ``Probably (Lee Jae-myung) said that former President Moon would ``visit.''
When he said that, everyone's feelings were mixed," he added. Concerning the investigation into the Daejang-dong scandal surrounding Lee Jae-myung, he said, ``I don't think former President Moon ordered it.
Of course we have to investigate. Although former President Moon is not directly responsible, there is a possibility that there are supporters (of Representative Lee Jae-myung) who think, ``It was because of you (former President Moon) that we lost the presidential election.''
” he pointed out. Former CEO Lee Jun-seok said, ``I think it would be a good idea to start looking for the cause from CEO Lee Jae-myung himself.'' On the 21st, former CEO Lee Jun-seok spoke about the motion to consent to the arrest of Representative Lee Jae-myung.
They both mentioned the possibility of a 'boycott' by Democratic Party members. Former Representative Lee said, ``If (both Democratic Party members) come in and vote down the bill, there will be a big fuss as they count the votes like last time.
If you're going to include it, it would be cleaner if you didn't include it.'' Furthermore, he argued that the timing of requesting a warrant for the arrest of representative Lee Jae-myung is delicate. Former representative Lee Jun-seok said, ``If both Lee Jae-myung and Democratic Party representative
If a person is detained after a substantive examination of the arrest warrant, the trial would have been going on for about three years, as seen in the previous investigation of former President Park Geun-hye. Therefore, in the middle of the trial, the first trial judge could only detain him for six months.
stomach. As a result, there was controversy as to whether President Park would be released or whether his detention would be extended.'' Former CEO Lee Jun-seok said, ``There was no election at that time, so the court extended (the detention).
``If Representative Lee is detained this time, it will happen six months from now, about a week before the preliminary vote.'' ``In that case, if the detention is not extended, Representative Lee will come out and say, ``I'm disappointed.''
They will argue that even if the detention is extended, it will be bad news for the Democratic Party. In both cases, the Democratic Party's position is that other variables will occur six months later, so the Democratic Party has avoided it now.
I guess so,” he added.
2023/09/20 20:58 KST
Copyrights(C) Herald wowkorea.jp 83