It is analyzed that this was decided as a party theory, and that there were a large number of votes against it. The last time a consent bill for the appointment of Supreme Court Chief Justice was rejected in the National Assembly was in 1988, when a consent bill for the appointment of Supreme Court Chief Justice candidate Chung Ki-sung was rejected.
This is the first time in 35 years. In a briefing after the vote, Democratic Party House spokesperson Yoon Yong-deok and Yoon Yeong-deok said, ``President Yoon Seo-gyul is worthy of the dignity of the head of the judiciary.''
The Legislature's recommendation to select a new person must be strictly accepted. "The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is not a place to 'find friends' for your private life," he criticized.
The bill for consent to appoint candidate Lee, which was tabled in the plenary session that afternoon, was rejected with 118 in favor, 175 against, and 2 abstentions out of the 295 members present.
It was done. House spokesperson Yoon said, ``(The rejection of the appointment) is the result of President Yoon's failure to approve the appointment.The National Assembly has chosen to ``reject'' the request for consent to appoint Lee, who is unsuitable in all respects in terms of morality and ability. The
"I had no choice but to do so." He continued, ``The people's power is making nonsense about rejecting the appointment proposal, saying that it is ``hindering the Yun Seok-Yue government.'' The Supreme Court is not the place to support and encourage the Yun Seok-Yue government.
"So, did President Yoon nominate Lee as the Supreme Court Chief Justice candidate based on his personal friendship?" Spokesperson Yoon said, ``President Yoon and the people's power will not ``drag their feet'' and will uphold the dignity of the head of the judiciary.
I hope they find the right person." Meanwhile, People's Power held a denunciation rally and criticized the Democratic Party for prolonging the Supreme Court Chief Justice's vacancy.
After the vote, Yoon Jae-ok, the National Power House representative, said at a denunciation rally that, ``Overall, it has caused a major hindrance to the administration of the judicial branch.
Naturally, all the damage was borne by the people who were waiting for the legal judgment. (Both Democrats) are the ones who are not talking about the president having to take responsibility for the vote by themselves.
"I'm doing a lot of work," he said. House floor representative Yun said, ``The Democratic Party's appearance in the National Assembly so far has been bulletproof for Representative Lee Jae-myung, opposition to undermine the Yun Seok-yew government, and a majority vote.
It's just a legislative frenzy that has pushed the seats to the forefront. "The people will remember how they stood together to represent the criminal suspects, not the political party with more than half the seats, and prevented the normal operation of the Diet."
Representative Kim Ki-hyun said, ``This is an outrageous act on the level of parliamentary terrorism aimed at preventing Lee's personal judicial risk.We cannot forget the left-biased political collusion that we enjoyed under the Kim Myung-soo judicial system, and this is blatantly
"The Democratic Party, along with Representative Lee who is prolonging the vacuum in the judicial branch, is parasitic on political trials and intends to prolong his political career."
Representative Kim said, ``Not only is it the Democratic Party's responsibility (to reject the nomination) as a public party, but also Representative Lee.
) As a political leader, he took on all his duties and responsibilities. Both history and the people will judge the Democratic Party's outrageous actions strictly."
2023/10/06 20:51 KST
Copyrights(C) Herald wowkorea.jp 83