South Korean soccer team Hwang Eui-jo releases video of victim's phone call ``It was intentionally manipulated''

On the 24th, South Korean national soccer player Hwang Eui-jo (31) said that the contents of the call released by the victim, who complained that a private video had been disseminated, were ``intentionally manipulated.''
revealed. On the same day, Dae Hwang Legal Corporation, the legal representative for Hwang, stated its position, saying, ``The released recording contains the unilateral claims of the female victim after the incident occurred.''
And he spoke like this. Dae-hwan said, ``The dissemination of footage of Hwang, as claimed by the female victim, is completely groundless,'' and ``I once again emphasize that Hwang is the victim.''
Earlier, the victim's legal representative Lee Eun-ui released a recorded phone call between victim A and player Hwang immediately after the video was distributed, saying it was ``part of a conversation that suggested illegal filming of Hwang Eui-jo.''
There is a history of disclosing the contents of messages on KakaoTalk. In the recording, Mr. A said, ``I clearly said I didn't like it,'' and ``I should admit that I acted illegally.''
In response, Hwang apologized, saying, ``When I took the picture, I didn't think something like this would happen,'' and ``I'm really sorry.'' Fans and players said, ``All the contents of the long-term conversation before that were made public.''
I would like to ask if they have any intention of opening up the matter.''He emphasized, ``The content of the dialogue between the parties held by the fans is actually in line with the claims made by the fans.''
However, he added, ``If the content of the conversation is made public, it could cause damage not only to the victim, but also to her family.''
) I plan to submit it to the investigative agency and use it to prove my innocence.'' Referring to his relationship with Mr. A, the fans and players stated, ``Psychological control or gaslighting cannot be established,'' and ``I have no specific details.
We will provide a detailed explanation and submit evidence through the investigating agency." At the same time, he added, ``The dichotomous approach of thinking that there is no problem with secondary perpetration against male victims is extremely worrying.''
"Just because the sex side makes a unilateral complaint and the man named as the perpetrator is investigated, that doesn't mean the man who is the suspect becomes a criminal."