South Korean ruling and opposition parties ``need to take measures to smooth supply'' as urea nightmare repeats from two years ago

On the 4th, South Korea's ruling and opposition parties urged the government to take measures in response to China's recent suspension of industrial urea customs clearance to South Korea, fearing a recurrence of the urea-water situation.
Kim Ki-hyun, representative of the People's Power (ruling party), said at the Supreme Committee meeting held in the National Assembly on the same day, ``Chinese customs clearance enters South Korea.
There are growing concerns that the urea water crisis experienced two years ago will be repeated. In addition to accurately understanding the situation, the relevant authorities are taking various measures to facilitate supply.
I hope they will explore it." He continued, ``Urea water is an essential item for removing nitrogen oxides at industrial sites and for people to operate light oil vehicles, and we request that countermeasures be taken with a sense of urgency.''
” he said. Yoo Eui-dong, chairman of the policy committee, also said, ``Recently, China suddenly suspended urea exports to South Korea, and there is great concern that the urea water crisis will return for the first time in two years.''
It becomes. "We must embark on structural improvements such as diversifying our supply chain while thoroughly managing external risks."
Also, Yoon Yong-deok (Yun Yong-deok) and Democratic Party (opposition) floor spokesperson also attended.
During a briefing on the same day, he asked, ``There are concerns that the urea water crisis will happen again.What on earth has the Yun Seo-gyul government been doing for the past two years?''
Spokesperson Yoon Yun said, ``The previous government experienced the urea water crisis two years ago and made efforts to reduce its dependence on China.However, the Yun Seok-yue government
``As a result, the country's dependence rate rose from 71% (under the Moon Jae-in government) to 91%.''
He continued, ``This situation stems from the diversification of the supply chain, which began with export restrictions to Japan under the previous administration.''
One cannot help but question whether this is due to the current administration's efforts to strengthen its pro-Japanese diplomacy, which have been halted. "Minimize disruptions in supply and demand through active communication with China while diversifying supply sources."
Ta.