”CEO Min Hee Jin, please stop making selective excuses and answer questions”... ADOR employee who filed sexual harassment complaints reveals additional statement

The label has issued an additional statement in response to CEO Min Hee Jin's rebuttal that it is not true that former employee B of the label ADOR covered up sexual harassment at work.
On the early morning of the 15th, Mr. B said that CEO Min was making false claims, saying, "He didn't mention any of the slander or deception he said about me, and instead focused on selective clarification, poor performance, and salary cuts, which led to the scandal."
"As expected, they tried to obscure and dilute the essence of the matter and cloud the issue," he said.
, while talking to the perpetrator, Executive A, did you insult me by calling me XXX (hereafter, slang), mentally ill XX, belittling the crime and telling me to suffer XX, etc., and did you ever help Executive A?
"In the process of handling my complaints of sexual harassment and bullying within the company, is such behavior a neutral attitude to be taken as the CEO?" "On July 31, under the pretext of explaining the allegations against me,
In response to this, we demanded that CEO Min provide a precise explanation, correct the error, and apologize.
B said, "The responsibility and obligation to investigate and handle cases of bullying and sexual harassment in the workplace rests with ADOR's CEO, Min.
"The CEO, who has the final decision-making authority in this case, personally declared that Executive A was innocent and decided not to even give a warning, so why are you constantly asking questions?
"Are they going to lie and pretend that they didn't happen? In accordance with the Labor Standards Act, we will take legal action against any inappropriate investigations into reporting workplace bullying."
In addition, B said in a previous rebuttal that CEO Min Hee Jin had said to him, "I am in my seventh year of employment and my base salary is equivalent to that of an executive, which is 130 million yen.
"I was the highest paid member of ADOR at 10,000 won," "There were many disappointments, such as numerous problems and noise from simple teaching duties," and "Discontent continued due to poor output."
They also criticized the company for disclosing the salary of employees and for claiming that the reason behind B's intention to resign was a salary cut. B said, "Disclosing the annual salary of employees and arbitrarily taking a 40% salary cut,
"It is illegal to disclose the reasons for my salary reduction without my consent," he said, "I will not accept the unilateral reduction in my annual salary from now on, as CEO Min Hee Jin has been talking about the reasons for the reduction and even revealing the figures to the public."
"Their actions are rude and arrogant, and should not be tolerated in any legal or common sense way," he said in anger. He also said that the research evaluation participants, except for Executive A, were "actively recommended" and "recommended."
"The essence of the case is CEO Min Hee Jin's cover-up of workplace bullying, deceiving the public through lies and patchwork, and publishing and editing KakaoTalk messages that she did not consent to.
"All I wanted was a correction of the lies and a public apology. I look forward to seeing you in court or at the Labor Commission. As you said, I hope that you will not trample on me for false accusations.
"I hope that if she knows the shame, she will not appear as a speaker in front of the public," he said. In response, Min Hee Jin's side released an additional statement.
Prior to this, CEO Min Hee Jin had posted on social media with executives A and B, and advertiser C after being accused of covering up a report of sexual harassment at work by B.
The conversation was made public. CEO Min stated, "Until now, everyone has reconciled well and understood that this is over," and clarified his position, saying, "I hope that we will not be swayed by any intentional distortions."
However, Mr. B later claimed that the KakaoTalk messages were published without his consent and that CEO Min was lying and distorting the story.
In an 18-page statement, the group countered, stating that B's statement contained false facts and raising suspicions that "it is not understandable that B suddenly appeared and targeted himself at a time when HYBE was being scolded."
I even woke him up.