8-day-old baby given to adult he met online = South Korea

It was later confirmed that the parents, both in their 20s, who handed over their 8-day-old baby to someone they met on the Internet have been referred to prosecutors.
The Gyeonggi Southern National Police Agency Women and Youth Division arrested a woman in her 20s on suspicion of violating the Child Welfare Act (abandonment/neglect).
It was announced on the 7th that Mr. A and Mr. B, both male and female, had been referred to prosecutors. On December 25, 2021, after giving birth to a baby girl at a hospital in Seoul, Mr. A, who was the baby's father and her boyfriend at the time,
He is accused of colluding with Mr. Mr. A decided to look for someone to take his daughter with him on the Internet, and on January 2nd of the following year, eight days after giving birth, he arrived at Gangbuk, Seoul.
He said he met three adults, a man and a woman, at a cafe in Gangbuk (Kangbuk) and handed over the baby. Mr. B was found to have accompanied Mr. A, and charges were filed together.
This incident took place between 2015 and 2022, when 1% of the 2,000 "unreported children" who had birth records but no birth notifications were filed.
This came to light during a case investigation process involving more than 20 people. The city of Hwaseong began checking on the child's safety, but the baby's whereabouts could not be determined. On June 9th, the police called for an investigation.
I requested it. After receiving the report, the police conducted an investigation for more than four months, but they were still unable to identify the three people who inherited the baby from Mr. A. Therefore, the life or death of the baby is unknown.
It's in an unknown state. Initially, Mr. A's mobile phone, which was the only clue in this investigation, was forensically conducted and the contents of past mobile messenger conversations were successfully recovered, providing a clue to the solution.
I thought it was found. However, it was discovered that the account of the person who supposedly took the baby had already been deleted, making it impossible to obtain subscriber information.
It was found that there were no circumstances in which Mr. A obtained any separate financial gain in the process of abandoning his child.