Information on the investigation into the late Lee Sun Kyun leaked... Prosecutor's investigator's home searched = South Korea

Regarding the allegations that information on the investigation into popular Korean actor Lee Sun Kyun, who committed suicide while under investigation for suspected illegal drug use, was leaked, the police have confirmed that prosecutors' investigators intervened in the initial report and are continuing their investigation.
According to the Korean broadcasting station SBS on the 25th, the Gyeonggi Southern National Police Agency, which was investigating the Lee investigation information leak case, recently identified the Incheon local police agency as the party involved in the leak of investigation information.
The prosecutor's office has been searched and a case has been filed against a detective named A for leaking official secrets. The investigation into the alleged illegal drug use of the late Lee Sun Kyun was reported in October last year.
The case was first reported by local media, which then published two exclusive articles about the matter. The police said that Mr. A was reporting on the details of the police's internal investigation into Mr. Lee, which was currently underway.
The police are reportedly aware that the information was leaked to Dia. The current investigative system makes it difficult for prosecutors to obtain information on internal police investigations, so they are investigating whether there are any additional people involved within the police.
Police plan to change Mr. A's status to a suspect and continue their investigation once the analysis of the seized items is complete. Prior to this, police had arrested a senior official from the Incheon Metropolitan Police Agency last month on suspicion of leaking information about the Lee investigation.
Police officer B was arrested on suspicion of leaking official secrets and violating the Personal Information Protection Act, and an arrest warrant was issued. B was arrested on suspicion of leaking official secrets and violating the Personal Information Protection Act, and
Mr. B, who belongs to another department, admitted to the crime during police investigation. The court considered that Mr. B admitted to the crime and that key evidence had been collected, and decided that there was no need for detention.
The warrant against Mr. B was dismissed because his sexuality was not recognized.