A Korean YouTuber was caught taking voyeur videos for the 101st time and had his revenue suspended. What was the response from his US headquarters?

A Korean YouTuber who was creating content to expose sex offenders who were illegally filming and report them to the police was suspended from making revenue from his channel by YouTube Korea.
On the 9th, the YouTube channel "Kampang Indoja (Prison Transferee)" posted on a community bulletin board that it had contacted Youtube's US headquarters and had the channel's suspension lifted.
"We received a notice from YouTube that revenue generation had resumed a while ago," he said. On the 7th of this month, the channel was suspended from generating revenue by YouTube Korea.
At the time, the person transferring him to the prison said, "I appealed the suspension of income generation, but it was rejected. The suspension of income generation was maintained for three months."
However, this YouTuber reported this to YouTube's US headquarters, not YouTube Korea, and the channel stopped generating revenue the next day.
The suspension was lifted. The prison transferee said, "Many people told me to contact YouTube headquarters, so I sent an email to the review team at the U.S. headquarters today."
After examining the uploaded video, they removed it because they thought there was no problem with it." The prison transferee said, "The head office removed it immediately, but YouTube Korea was the first to
"I wonder what the problem was that led to the suspension," he said. The channel, which has 160,000 subscribers, is known for taking upskirt photos of women in public places such as subway stations, escalators, shopping malls, and parks.
The channel mainly creates and publishes content that involves catching people, collecting evidence, and handing them over to the police.
Most of the reactions are positive, such as "He is working hard to catch the culprits" and "He is a good person who is purifying society." However, there are some who are concerned that the damage caused by the reckless private punishment and defamation is
There are also concerns that there is a possibility that a dispute could arise if an ordinary person claims to have committed an illegal act on their own initiative, but it is not true, and that filming a video could be a violation of their honor.
This may be a violation of human rights such as defamation. In fact, in September 2022, "Naver Knowledge iN" posted a question titled "Can I sue the person who was transferred to prison for voyeurism and defamation?"
The person who posted the question said, "I'm embarrassed to say that I was caught taking pictures secretly on the street three months ago by a prison extradition officer, and the police are currently investigating me."
I am truly sorry for my actions. However, I cannot say that this person's actions were less vicious than mine," he wrote, asking whether he could sue for defamation.