Can ADOR prevent ”NewJeans' NJZ activities”? First hearing for provisional ban on activities today (7th)

The first hearing date for the provisional injunction issued by ADOR against members of NewJeans (NJZ) for a "total ban on activities" has been held.
Today (7th), at the Seoul Central District Court 50th Civil Division hearing, ADOR announced that five members of "NewJeans"
The hearing date for the provisional injunction against ADOR for "preserving the agency's position and prohibiting the conclusion of advertising contracts, etc." will be held. This is the first time since NewJeans announced the termination of its exclusive contract with ADOR in November last year.
This is the first court proceeding. NewJeans notified ADOR that its exclusive contract had been terminated on November 29th of last year, but in December ADOR filed a lawsuit in the Seoul Central District Court claiming that the exclusive contract had been terminated.
They filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of validity, arguing that "an exclusive contract between a company and an artist cannot be easily terminated based solely on the assertion of one side."
However, NewJeans completed its existing schedule and showed its own unique progress.
OR has admitted that ADOR was in the position of a management company (agency) following an exclusive contract until the first instance judgment of the "Lawsuit for Confirmation of the Validity of the Exclusive Contract" was rendered, and that it has not granted "New
In order to prevent the members of "Jeans" from signing advertising contracts and engaging in advertising activities on their own, the agency filed for a provisional injunction to "preserve the agency's position and prohibit the signing of advertising contracts, etc."
However, "NewJeans" has since publicly solicited a new group name, and is currently continuing its own path as "NJZ".
eans' parents published an article on the "NJZ PR Channel" stating that ADOR had expanded the purpose of its application for a provisional injunction.
According to this, on February 11th, ADOR ended all of its musical activities, including writing lyrics, composing, performing, and singing for "NJZ," as well as advertising.
The parents of NewJeans claimed that this was a "retaliatory measure," and ADOR responded by saying,
"ADOR" has expanded its activities overseas, so the purpose of the provisional injunction application has been unethically expanded.
"The intention is to continue our entertainment activities together while respecting our contracts," he said, adding, "ADO will clearly explain the misunderstandings of the artists in court tomorrow, and many staff members are waiting for them to come forward."
"We will ask for a ruling that ADOR is the agency for NewJeans." Today (7th), the court proceedings between ADOR and NewJeans will begin.
With NJZ claiming that this is a retaliatory measure, with ADOR claiming that the intention is to cut ties with them, public attention is being focused on the application for the provisional injunction.