'Malicious form of accusation' Singer IU's plagiarism accusation dismissed... 10th year of suspicions

Singer IU has been accused of plagiarism for the past 10 years, and a decision has been made to dismiss her work in connection with a case of copyright violation.
On the 4th, IU's management office EDAM Entertainment announced that IU had written a book in May last year.
It was revealed that the decision to dismiss was made in connection with a case in which he was accused of violating copyright law. Prior to this, in May last year, Mr. A, a member of the public, said that he wanted to buy IU's "Red Shoes,
6 songs including ``Day'', ``BBI BBI'', ``pitiful'', ``Boo'', and ``Celebrity'' plagiarized the music of foreign and Korean artists.
He was accused of violating the copyright law. IU participated in the work on ``Celebrity'' and ``BBI BBI'' out of the 6 songs. When IU is accused of plagiarism, multiple composers come together to refute the allegations.
It came out. In particular, Lee Jung-hoon, the composer of ``BBI BBI,'' said, ``Copyright is the domain of the composer, not the singer.
``It seems like there is an intention to put IU in trouble.'' According to official press materials from Shinwon, a law firm that serves as IU's legal representative, the investigative agency said that the facts of the accusation do not constitute a crime.
The decision was made to reject the application for the following reasons. The law firm stated, ``We strongly condemn the form of accusations that are malicious, and the kind that is collective and violent toward artists.''
It was an incident that was carried out maliciously for the sake of the police." In addition to this incident, blatant and malicious cyberbullying by specific groups continues, adding, ``Since last year,
"Even in the creative field that is most important to us, we have produced 'patchwork content' that attempts to damage the reputation of artists, causing a plagiarism affair."
He said he had created a situation where he had to do so. ``Sustained legal measures have been taken, and punishments for some malicious comments continue to occur.''
We will not overlook violent and illegal acts such as 'Moebling'," and teased a strong response. While IU's alleged violation of the copyright law was dismissed, IU was accused of plagiarism.
Attention is focused on whether they can escape.