President Yoon's side to ”file for power dispute arbitration and provisional injunction to suspend effectiveness” = South Korea

The defense team for South Korean President Yoon Seok-yeol, who is suspected of being a "mastermind of rebellion," said they would "file an application for a powers dispute hearing and a provisional injunction to suspend the effectiveness of the arrest warrant with the Constitutional Court."
On the 31st, immediately after the court issued the arrest warrant, Yoon Kap-geun, a lawyer representing President Yoon, said, "We will apply to the Constitutional Court for a powers dispute hearing and a provisional injunction to suspend the validity of the arrest warrant."
Prior to this, Attorney Yoon told reporters, "An arrest warrant was issued by an unauthorized agency. The process and procedures for requesting the warrant were not normal.
"The arrest warrant itself is illegal and invalid," he said. This means that he pointed out the legitimacy of the warrant itself, which was issued by the High Officials Investigation Agency, which has no authority to investigate the president.
Yoon said, "The issuance of an arrest warrant is not always right or wrong. Even in ordinary criminal cases, there are many cases where the outcome is different from the issuance of the warrant.
"The president is the head of state as defined by the Constitution," he said, "and has the duty to uphold the law so that it is properly enforced. In areas where the law is not being followed, the president can take action."
It is imperative that we deal with it decisively."